- Next »
- « Previous
Question Answered
Before learning Six Sigma and Lean techniques I followed standard accounting:
(All tables and numbers are courtesy of Ron Crabtree, CPIM, CIRM Villanova Lean Accounting Lecture)
Total Burdens 1,550,000
Direct Labor ‘Planned’ Hours 98,000
(50 people working 49, 40-fr weeks)
Burden absorption rate to apply: $ 15.82
Direct labor rate: $ 15.00
Fringes, vac./hol. And taxes at 27% $ 4.05
Total variable labor hourly: $ 19.05
Labor with Burden $ 34.87
A new method of accounting is Activity Based Costing – Comparison to “Absorption”
Absorption Activity Cost Approach
- Job Overhead absorbed - Job A and B ABC:
in hourly rate - OE cost $100
- Job A uses 10 hours @ $16= 160 - Purchasing $150
in overheads - Work order $125
- Job B uses 100 hours = $1,600 in overheads - Accounting $125
- Eng. Supt. $200
- Activity Cost Total $700
If you used the Absorption method you over charge the customer an extraordinary amount for Job B and end up taking a loss on Job A.
Now to answer the original question I posted:
We use Throughput Accounting based on the Theory of Constraints. Because you are practicing Lean and Six Sigma Techniques you know your total system, the constraints, and are thus better able to focus on Value Add time. You know how to calculate system output value.
For 100 items
Job A hrs. req’s Job B hrs req’s Job A req’s Job B req’s
Resource X 7 5 700 500
Resource Y 3 6 300 600
Resource Z 8 7 800 700
Sales Value $100 $125 $10,000 $12,500
Knowing your system you know that Resource Y is a capacity constraint resource and only has 400hrs available. If you chose B then you can only produce 67 x $125 = $8,375. BUT if you chose A then you can produce 100 x $100= $10,000 plus you have another 100hrs available from resource Y and can produce 17 units of B at $125 = $2,125
Total profits if you chose A = $12,125
Total profits if you chose B = $8,375
When I first posted this question Rob, as I expected, was right on target with his questioning… he knew to look further.
“Michael,
I am not sure we have enough information. Job A and B each require the same amount of total hours of resources which you say are all costing the same amount. Let's say in your example the three resources are x= designer, y= installer, z=service technician. Job A requires more design time, and more service time, but very little installer time, Job B requires a more balanced number of hours, and it also pays more.
I would want to know whether there are any limits on the amount of each resource (emphasis added) and whether one of these resources was more iffy in terms of delivery or availability,
(text removed)
Rob
Is Your Corporation Protecting You?”
I cannot state the reason for this post more effectively than Sales Trainer and Coach www.SteveChambers.com stated:
“Six Sigma is a cool tool (emphasis added) and a neat philosophy with which to approach business. Thinking in a lean and efficient manner is a key business strength.”
Comments
This shows me that I would want to hire someone trained in these techniques to apply them to my company since all that stuff gave me a low-grade headache just reading through it. I don't have the time nor the inclination to go into the calculations or education required. I do see a definite advantage to having a skilled individual available as an asset to any company and will keep this in mind for future considerations.
Thanks for a very thorough post, Michael.
Sue
Secondly, congrats on your grasp of accounting. While I enjoyed cost accounting the standard accounting courses kicked my butt and I never was able to reliably work through a statement of cash flow. This despite four years of calculus and statistics. You are obviously very skilled at this and it shows.
Steve Chambers
Sales Trainer and Coach
I'm not a business person. You lost me on the first post.
Lisa McLellan
Today I give thanks for YOU.
Sonya Lenzo
I'm sorry I have been absent in the past few weeks
Looks like this is a new way for me to think of my cost estimating.
Do you have a program available to teach this process?
I remember you taking notes at boot camp in a very unusual way as well is that part of this mindset also?
Focus Your Energy
Matthew Shields
Unusual suits me well, I seem to excel at it. This is the reason I am able to look at mundane tasks from a different prospective and create new, quicker, and more efficient processes. This is the reason Six Sigma and I get along so well.
I was recently approached about programs to teach Six Sigma and Lean. Before I begin instruction I want to master the art. Because of this desire The Inner Circle is going to benefit greatly. I am going to begin looking into everyone's industry and building posts based on the information I compile. Each industry specific post will have the friends only option selected to help keep it from prying eyes.
That is of course for those interested. Right now I am engaged in two projects, one for my Black Belt certification and one for my company. After these two are complete I am going to focus on the interested parties within the Circle.
Michael Christian Neumann
Six Sigma and Lean Consulting